What is an Access Review?
An Access Review is a planned and structured evaluation of:
Access Reviews are a core identity governance control that help ensure:
Why access reviews matter
Access Reviews help organizations:
Where access reviews are performed
Plan your access review strategy
Before enabling access reviews, you must define why, what, and how you will review access.
Key planning questions:
Engage the right stakeholders
Access reviews are not just an IT task. They require collaboration across the organization.
Key stakeholder groups
| Stakeholder | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| IT Administration | Manages infrastructure, identity, SaaS apps, and cloud services. |
| Development Teams | Build and maintain applications that require governed access. |
| Business Units | Own applications, projects, and data. |
| Corporate Governance | Ensures compliance with internal policies and regulations. |
Why stakeholder planning matters
Important Manual reviews require sufficient reviewers and realistic timelines. Too many reviews or too few reviewers results in poor access decisions.
What is Microsoft Entra ID Governance?
Microsoft Entra Identity Governance helps organizations balance:
It provides visibility, controls, and auditing for access across:
Identity Governance answers four critical questions
Plan a pilot access review
Microsoft strongly recommends starting with a pilot.
Why start with a pilot?
Recommended pilot practices
What resource types can be reviewed?
Once resources are integrated with Microsoft Entra ID, they can be reviewed.
Supported review targets
Who can create and manage access reviews?
The required role depends on what is being reviewed.
Access review permissions by resource type
Groups and Applications
Creators:
Readers:
Microsoft Entra Roles
Creators:
Readers:
Azure Resource Roles
Creators:
Readers:
Access Packages
Creators:
Readers:
Who performs the review?
The reviewer is chosen at creation time and cannot be changed once the review starts.
Reviewer personas
| Reviewer Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Resource Owners | Business owners of the resource. |
| Delegated Reviewers | Individually selected users or groups. |
| End Users | Users self-attest their own access. |
Multiple reviewers can be assigned. The last decision submitted wins.
Components of an access review plan
Before creating a review, you must define the following.
Required planning inputs
Example access review plan
| Component | Example |
|---|---|
| Resource | Microsoft Dynamics access |
| Frequency | Monthly |
| Reviewers | Dynamics business program managers |
| Notification | Email 24 hours before review |
| Timeline | 48 hours |
| Automatic Action | Remove access for inactive users |
| Manual Action | Optional reviewer approval |
| Communication | Notify removed users |
Plan access reviews for access packages
Access Packages simplify governance by grouping resources.
Why use access packages for reviews?
Key points
Plan access reviews for groups
Group-based access is the recommended access model.
Why review groups instead of individual access?
Who can review group membership?
Group ownership considerations
| Group Type | Ownership Guidance |
|---|---|
| Microsoft 365 / Entra groups | Owners defined; ideal reviewers. |
| Teams | Team creator is owner; best reviewer. |
| Script-created groups | Owners should be explicitly assigned. |
| On-prem synced groups | No Entra owner; select reviewers manually. |
Best practice Define business rules for group creation and ownership to ensure accountability.
Review Conditional Access exclusion groups
Some users must be excluded from Conditional Access policies.
Example:
These exclusion groups must be reviewed regularly, as they often contain high-risk exceptions.
Review external users’ group memberships
Best practices
Review access to on-premises groups
Important limitation:
How to handle this
Plan access reviews for applications
Application reviews focus on who can access a specific app.
Use application reviews when
Application owners cannot be auto-selected as reviewers.
Plan reviews for privileged roles
Privileged Identity Management (PIM) integrates with access reviews.
Roles that should be reviewed regularly
Monitor and deploy access reviews
After planning, deploy reviews across:
Use Microsoft Graph for automation
Common automation tasks
Tip Use Graph Explorer to test queries before scripting.
Monitor access review activity
Access review actions are logged in Microsoft Entra Audit Logs.
Sample audit filters
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | Policy |
| Activity | Create / Update / End / Apply review |
| Date | Last 7 days |
For advanced monitoring:
Plan communications
Communication is critical for success.
Communication best practices
Licensing requirements
Who needs Microsoft Entra ID Premium P2?
Who does NOT need P2?